On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:10:05PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 05/09/12 16:07, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > I notice in the trace_report_180secs.txt file, lsn (ail_push and the > ungrants) displays are not correct. It acts like the BLOCK_LSN() is > shifting too much. What do you mean by "not correct"? > Block sequence numbers never make it too far > above 1100 before incrementing the cycle. I think the problem is the > trace not the sequence numbers. The log is only 576 filesystem blocks (which are 1k in size) long, which means 1152 sectors, so the LSN block number portion will never go above 1152. It looks correct to me.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
