Re: [PATCH] Introduce SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE support V8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/17/12 07:16, Jeff Liu wrote:
Hello,

This is the revised patch according to Dave's comments for V7.

Changes to V8:
--------------
1. If there is an internal error raised at extent reading routine, just
return it rather than ENXIO.
2. Add the commit message.
3. Remove the for(;;) loop since there is no continuous holes shown even
if create a Petabyte sparse file with hole extent length longer than
32-bit.  Thanks Dave for helping verify that!
4. In xfs_seek_data(), s/len/end/, looks 'end' is more meaningful here
to indicate the range of extents mapped.
5. Remove BUG() from xfs_seek_data() since xfs_bmapi_read() have found
any corruption during the lookup, it should not occurred at all.

Any comments are appreciated!

Thanks,
-Jeff


Signed-off-by: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  This patch adds lseek(2) SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE functionality.

+STATIC loff_t
+xfs_seek_hole(
+	struct file		*file,
+	loff_t			start,
+	u32			type)
+{
+	struct inode		*inode = file->f_mapping->host;
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip = XFS_I(inode);
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
+	loff_t			uninitialized_var(offset);
+	loff_t			holeoff;
+	xfs_fsize_t		isize;
+	xfs_fileoff_t		fsbno;
+	uint			lock;
+	int			error;
+
+	lock = xfs_ilock_map_shared(ip);
+
+	isize = i_size_read(inode);
+	if (start>= isize) {
+		error = ENXIO;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
+	fsbno = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, start);
+	error = xfs_bmap_first_unused(NULL, ip, 1,&fsbno, XFS_DATA_FORK);
+	if (error)
+		goto out_unlock;
+
+	holeoff = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, fsbno);
+	if (holeoff<= start)
+		offset = start;
+	else
+		offset = min_t(loff_t, holeoff, isize);
+
+	if (offset != file->f_pos)
+		file->f_pos = offset;
+
+out_unlock:
+	xfs_iunlock_map_shared(ip, lock);
+
+	if (error)
+		return -error;
+	return offset;
+}

Sorry this got set aside. This is being dusted off for inclusion.

Refresh my memory, do we need a XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN test in
xfs_seek_hole()? In the earlier versions it was covered in the
xfs_bmapi_read().

A comment on the min_t() that the xfs_bmap_first_unused() could
return a value bigger than the isize if there are no more holes
may help the forgetful such as myself.

Otherwise it looks good.

Thank-you.

Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux