On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:48:53PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > xfstest 270 was causing quota reservations way beyond what was sane > (ten to hundreds of TB) for a 4GB filesystem. There's a sign problem > in the error handling path of xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc() because > xfs_trans_unreserve_quota_nblks() simple negates the value passed - > which doesn't work for an unsigned variable. This causes > reservations of close to 2^32 block instead of removing a > reservation of a handful of blocks. > > Fix the same problem in the other xfs_trans_unreserve_quota_nblks() > callers where unsigned integer variables are used, too. eww. Wouldn't it be better to make handle that inside xfs_trans_unreserve_quota_nblks? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs