On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 09:44:23AM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:14:39AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:15:46PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > > I'm also testing this patch set them without Jan's work, since I'm not sure when > > > it will be pulled in. Here's the latest: > > > > > > case login: [ 2934.077472] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc900036a8010 > > > [ 2934.078452] IP: [<ffffffffa009a790>] xlog_get_lowest_lsn+0x30/0x80 [xfs] > > > [ 2934.078452] PGD 12b029067 PUD 12b02a067 PMD 378f5067 PTE 0 > > > [ 2934.078452] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP > > > [ 2934.078452] CPU 1 > > > [ 2934.078452] Modules linked in: xfs(O) exportfs e1000e [last unloaded: xfs] > > > [ 2934.078452] > > > [ 2934.078452] Pid: 9031, comm: kworker/1:15 Tainted: G O 3.4.0-rc2+ #3 SGI.COM AltixXE310/X7DGT-INF > > > > What out-of-tree module do you have loaded that tainted the kernel? > > The ethernet driver? > > I tend to build xfs out of tree and then 'insmod ./xfs.ko'. Ok, do you rmmod the xfs.ko module and insert new ones, or just reboot whenever you have a new module for testing? I'm assuming that you are unloading and reloading based on the "[last unloaded: xfs]" above. That has always made me nervous about memory corruption intorudced by a previous module affecting the running of a current module.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
