On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:29:32AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:58:20AM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: ... > > Right. Here's the output from a few minutes ago (I removed the empty lines > > and redundant column headings): > > Thanks, that makes it easy to read ;) Yeah, I don't know who's brilliant idea it was to output the headings every time. > Now comes the "more data needed" bit. I still need the sysrq-w > output, D'oh! Totally forgot to put that up somewhere. http://31bits.net/download/xfs_log.gz Sadly, it looks like the kernel's ring buffer wrapped while dumping the ~180 stacks. > but also given the length of the incident, some other data > is definitely needed: > > - a 30s event trace - it'll compress pretty well > (trace-cmd record -e xfs* sleep 30; trace-cmd report > output.txt) Hrm... Time to figure out how to get ftrace going on Gentoo. I don't see an obvious package to install to get trace-cmd. > - vmstat 1 output for the same period > - output of /proc/meminfo at the same time > - the same iostat output for comparison. Jeff. -- I'm somewhere between geek and normal. - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
