Brian Candler wrote:
--------------------------
Ah, that's new to me. So with inode32 and
sysctl fs.xfs.rotorstep=255
you can get roughly the same locality benefit for sequentially-written files
as inode64? (Aside: if you have two processes writing files to two
different
directories, will they end up mixing their files in the same AG? That
could hurt performance at readback time if reading them sequentially)
-----------------------------
The "filestreams" mount option may be of use here, see:
http://xfs.org/docs/xfsdocs-xml-dev/XFS_User_Guide//tmp/en-US/html/ch06s16.html
and page 17 of:
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/training/xfs_slides_06_allocators.pdf
Regards,
Richard
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
