Hey Dave, On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:12:58PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:29:11PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:10:43PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > Here's a repost of my current patch queue. They are all based on Christoph's > > > ilock and xfsbufd patch series and been tested on top of them. I've updated all > > > the reviewed-by tags, so if the patch is missing such a tag then it hasn't been > > > reviewed.... > > > > Looks like Christoph has some work to do on patch 4 of his xfsbufd series. Do > > you want to rebase to something without that patch? > > It's a bit of a PITA to do because of all the overlap with > Christoph's patch set. I noticed. ;) > I'll spend the afternoon trying to work out > what is wrong with Christoph's code, because I think we really need > to get rid of the xfsbufd before I start making the buffer code more > complex again... Cool. I agree it's great to get rid of xfsbufd, just wanted you to know that the hang is blocking this series. Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
