On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 05:56:56PM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> Remove an unnecessary usage() call after a mkfs failure due an invalid inode
> size.
> A call to usage() at this point confuses the output message which may cause the
> user to think it used wrong arguments to mkfs, instead of an invalid inode size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> index 5445b6f..19d4815 100644
> --- a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> +++ b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> @@ -1898,7 +1898,7 @@ _("block size %d cannot be smaller than logical sector size %d\n"),
> fprintf(stderr,
> _("allowable inode size with %d byte blocks is between %d and %d\n"),
> blocksize, XFS_DINODE_MIN_SIZE, maxsz);
> - usage();
> + exit(1);
> }
Looks like a good idea to me - no need to spam with usage
information.
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
