On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 04:08:22PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:03:30PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > These 3 patches sit on top of my recent series titled: > > > > [PATCH 0/8] xfs: clean up unit usage in xfs_buf V2 > > > > These patches remove bits of the API that are effectively the > > default behaviour used by everything or are redundant. This just > > makes API usage simpler and gives it a smaller footprint to modify > > in future. > > If you touch these interfaces any chance you could kill the impliciy > XBF_MAPPED thing we do in various places? Probably best by reversing > it and only pass in an XBF_UNMAPPED for the inode buffers as that's > the only place where we want them. Sounds like a good idea. I'll write a patch to do this.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
