Re: XFS: Abysmal write performance because of excessive seeking (allocation groups to blame?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/10/2012 10:02 AM, Stefan Ring wrote:
And is XFS aligned to the RAID 6?

What does xfs_info display on it?

Yes, it’s aligned.

meta-data=/dev/mapper/vg_data-lvhome isize=256    agcount=4,
agsize=73233656 blks
          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=292934624, imaxpct=5
          =                       sunit=8      swidth=32 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=143040, version=2
          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=8 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

I changed the stripe size to 32kb in the meantime. This way, it
performs slightly better.

try 128k to 512k for stripe size. And try to increase your agcount by (nearly) an order of magnitude.


--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics Inc.
email: landman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web  : http://scalableinformatics.com
       http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster
phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
fax  : +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux