On 4/7/2012 3:49 AM, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:28:37 -0500 vous écriviez: > >> Creating four 60 drive RAID10 arrays, let alone 60 drive RAID6 >> arrays, would be silly. > > From my experience, with modern arrays don't make much of a difference. > I've reached decent IOPS (i. e. about 4000 IOPS) on large arrays of up > to 46 drives provided there are enough threads -- more threads than > spindles, preferably. Are you speaking of a mixed metadata/data heavy IOPS workload similar to that which is the focus of this thread, or another type of workload? Is this 46 drive array RAID10 or RAID6? -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
