Le Sat, 7 Apr 2012 09:27:50 +0200 vous écriviez:
> So it sounds like that for poor guys like us, who can’t afford the
> hardware to have dozens of spindles, the best option would be to
> create the XFS file system with agcount=1? That seems to be the only
> reasonable conclusion to me, since a single RAID device, like a single
> disk, cannot write in parallel anyway.
You best option is to buy a SSD. Seriously, even a basic decent consumer
model will bury your array in the dust. Also, recent RAID controllers
from LSI and Adaptec are able to "enhance" a spinning rust array by
using an SSD as a cache.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
