Re: [PATCH 3/5] xfs: reduce ilock hold times in xfs_setattr_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/27/12 09:34, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
We do not need the ilock for most checks done in the beginning of
xfs_setattr_size.  Replace the long critical section before starting the
transaction with a smaller one around xfs_zero_eof and an optional one
inside xfs_qm_dqattach that isn't entered unless using quotas.  While
this isn't a big optimization for xfs_setattr_size itself it will allow
pushing the ilock into xfs_zero_eof itself later.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@xxxxxx>


Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux