On 03/31/12 18:28, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Given that we now drop invalid unlinked inode lists there is no message
to capture. Also add a sed expression to avoid failures on old repair
versions.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@xxxxxx>
Index: xfstests-dev/030
===================================================================
--- xfstests-dev.orig/030 2012-03-31 23:15:11.000000000 +0000
+++ xfstests-dev/030 2012-03-31 23:18:31.000000000 +0000
@@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ _check_ag()
for structure in 'sb 0' 'agf 0' 'agi 0' 'agfl 0'
do
echo "Corrupting $structure - setting bits to $1"
- _check_repair $1 "$structure"
+ _check_repair $1 "$structure" |
+ sed -e 's/error following ag 0 unlinked list//'
done
}
@@ -97,8 +98,7 @@ src/devzero -v -1 -n "$clear" $SCRATCH_D
# now kick off the real repair test...
#
-_scratch_mkfs_xfs $DSIZE | _filter_mkfs | \
- sed -e 's/error following ag 0 unlinked list//' 2>$tmp.mkfs
+_scratch_mkfs_xfs $DSIZE | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.mkfs
. $tmp.mkfs
_check_ag 0
_check_ag -1
Index: xfstests-dev/030.out.linux
===================================================================
--- xfstests-dev.orig/030.out.linux 2012-03-31 23:19:09.000000000 +0000
+++ xfstests-dev/030.out.linux 2012-03-31 23:19:17.000000000 +0000
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ bad agbno AGBNO for inobt root, agno 0
root inode chunk not found
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan and clear agi unlinked lists...
-error following ag 0 unlinked list
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
The sed left a blank line where where the "error following ag 0 unlinked
list" would have been in an 3.0.x kernel run of the test.
Maybe add another "sed -e '/^$/d'" to the filter?
--Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
