[PATCH] Fix wrong flag ASSERT in xfs_attr_shortform_getvalue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This ASSERT is testing an if_flags flag value against
a di_aformat enum value.  di_aformat is never assigned
XFS_IFINLINE.

This happens to work for now, because XFS_IFINLINE has
the same value as XFS_DINODE_FMT_LOCAL, and that's tested
just before we call this function.

However, I think the intention is to assert that we have
read in the data, i.e. XFS_IFINLINE on if_flags, before
we use if_data.  This is done in other places through the
code as well.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Note, maybe it should be:

	ASSERT(args->dp->i_d.di_aformat == XFS_DINODE_FMT_LOCAL);

but there is an if statement in the caller which assures that,
so as the code stands that would seem pointless.  I'm not 100%
sure what the original intent was, though, so ...

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
index 76d93dc..8ca76ad 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_getvalue(xfs_da_args_t *args)
 	xfs_attr_sf_entry_t *sfe;
 	int i;
 
-	ASSERT(args->dp->i_d.di_aformat == XFS_IFINLINE);
+	ASSERT(args->dp->i_afp->if_flags == XFS_IFINLINE);
 	sf = (xfs_attr_shortform_t *)args->dp->i_afp->if_u1.if_data;
 	sfe = &sf->list[0];
 	for (i = 0; i < sf->hdr.count;

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux