On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 05:14:24PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We do not need the ilock for most checks done in the beginning of > xfs_setattr_size. Replace the long critical section before starting the > transaction with a smaller one around xfs_zero_eof and an optional one > inside xfs_qm_dqattach that isn't entered unless using quotas. While > this isn't a big optimization for xfs_setattr_size itself it will allow > pushing the ilock into xfs_zero_eof itself later. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Looks sane to me. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
