On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:34:29PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > On 14 March 2012 08:40, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It ignores lines that it doesn't understand the descriptor for (like > > all the v2 btree stats). I should probably update the pmda fo all > > those stats.... > > > > That was done quite awhile back (mid-2010), unless there's some other > stats come along since then that I don't know about yet? (are these the > ones you mean, Dave?...) > > $ egrep '^[a-z]+2 ' /proc/fs/xfs/stat > abtb2 4769967 54332939 635853 643428 507 508 282413 22672 61298 45587 1093 > 1111 1600 1619 393677507 > abtc2 10166604 113971561 4264119 4272402 1213 1214 77487 9464 29584 35760 > 1551 1571 2764 2785 1438715558 > bmbt2 152523 1231148 52950 42558 0 0 1372 1385 5117 1340 85 48 85 48 1545160 > ibt2 9475130 102652889 5672 2878 0 0 6549337 15214 801 869 17 0 17 0 1202730 > $ > > ( those are the xfs.btree.alloc_blocks.*, xfs.btree.alloc_contig.*, > xfs.btree.block_map.*, and xfs.btree.inode.lookup.* metrics ) Yeah, that's them. I hadn't noticed them in name space because I'd been looking for similar metric names to xfs.bmap_btree rather than in a separate xfs.btree heirarchy. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
