Sean, On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 11:08:38AM -0500, Sean Thomas Caron wrote: > OK, Linux 3.2.9 doesn't sound very safe to use in production. So, fine, > we can try 3.0.23; it appears that a fix for CVE-2012-0056 was applied > around 3.0.19 so it should be all set in that regard. > > I'm comparing the contents of the xfs-bulletproof-sync patch with the > 3.0.23 XFS sources and it's not entirely clear to me if 3.0.23 fully > implements the fixes in the patch. Please forgive me because it's a > little long, but here's the contents of the patch: Looks like this fix made 3.0.16: # git describe 6826d3e80d143ca7411fd2dca05bc57c7ed3e620 v3.0.15-68-g6826d3e -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
