On 2/22/12 12:27 PM, Ben Myers wrote: > With Mitsuo Hayasaka's kernel patch "xfs: change available ranges of softlimit > and hardlimit in quota check", xfs quota behavior is slightly different. > > This needs to be reflected in test 050. The new behavior is that we only start > the timer when we're above soft inode quota, and we don't start the timer when > we're at or below. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> > Index: xfstests/050.out > =================================================================== > --- xfstests.orig/050.out > +++ xfstests/050.out > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rte > > *** push past the soft block limit > [ROOT] 0 0 0 00 [--------] 3 0 0 00 [--------] 0 0 0 00 [--------] > -[NAME] 140 100 500 00 [7 days] 4 4 10 00 [7 days] 0 0 0 00 [--------] > +[NAME] 140 100 500 00 [7 days] 4 4 10 00 [--------] 0 0 0 00 [--------] ... Hm, but now old kernels would fail. Maybe it's better to go 1 past the limit in the test, rather than meet it, and then it'd fail on both old & new kernels? -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
