On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:37:07PM +0100, Rafa?? Kupka wrote: > On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 05:43 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hello, > > > From the trace this looks like we got incorrect results from xfs_imap, > > which got some fairly significant changes between the two kernels > > you tested. Can you check if 2.6.36 shows this issue? It's the first > > kernel that had these big changes in inode lookup. > > I've tested more kernels and here are results (linus git tree, no > additional patches): > - v2.6.36 -- good > - v2.6.38 -- good > - v2.6.39 -- bad, I/O error log entry and locked processes: > - git revision 243b422af9ea9af4ead07a8ad54c90d4f9b6081a -- good > It's one patch before "xfs: preallocation transactions do not need to be synchronous" > > - git revision c5850150d0b9ae16840c5d9846f9d5a759996a15: > Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs > > * 'for-linus' of git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs: > xfs: stop using the page cache to back the buffer cache > xfs: register the inode cache shrinker before quotachecks > xfs: xfs_trans_read_buf() should return an error on failure This is the only patch in that area. Give me a bit more time to figure out how it could related to your issues. > Hung xfsdump (only?) without any additional log entries > (CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG is set): > I don't know if it's the same bug - there is no assertion nor I/O error > log entry... It's the same code path at least.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
