On 3/2/2012 3:57 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 3/2/12 6:26 AM, Stefan Behrens wrote: >> When the xfstests are executed in a batch (like "check 001-299") >> and produce syslog output, it is helpful to know which test was >> causing the output. Therefore each time a test is started, a >> syslog message is generated that contains the number of the >> xfstest. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I like this; I almost sent a similar patch once. > > But would like to let others chime in as well to be sure. > > Is "logger" universal and portable to other systems? That'd be > my only concern with the patch. logger(1) is included in the POSIX specification. > > -Eric > >> --- >> check | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/check b/check >> index f792009..883edcc 100755 >> --- a/check >> +++ b/check >> @@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ do >> start=`_wallclock` >> $timestamp && echo -n " ["`date "+%T"`"]" >> [ ! -x $seq ] && chmod u+x $seq # ensure we can run it >> + logger "run xfstest $seq" >> ./$seq >$tmp.rawout 2>&1 >> sts=$? >> $timestamp && _timestamp _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs