On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:02:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > + __uint32_t xs_qm_dquots; > > + __uint32_t xs_qm_dquots_unused; > > +#define XQMSTAT_END_XQM (XQMSTAT_END_XQMSTAT + 4) > > Shouldn't that be (XQMSTAT_END_XQMSTAT + 2)? Yes. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs