When we find a duplicate extent in an extern format inode we do not zap
the whole inode, but just truncate it to the point where the duplicate
extent was found. But the current code only updates di_nblocks for the
new size, but no di_nextents/di_anextents. In most cases this isn't noticed,
but when moving such an inode to the lost+found directoy the consistency
check in xfs_iformat trips over it. Fix this by updating the on-disk
extent count as part of the inode repair.
Note that we zap btree format inodes with duplicate block completely
at this point, so this fix doesn't apply to them.
Reported-by: Arkadiusz Mi??kiewicz <arekm@xxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Arkadiusz Mi??kiewicz <arekm@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
updates since v2:
- address review comments from Dave
Index: xfsprogs-dev/repair/dinode.c
===================================================================
--- xfsprogs-dev.orig/repair/dinode.c 2012-01-11 11:23:30.000000000 +0000
+++ xfsprogs-dev/repair/dinode.c 2012-02-02 11:19:43.000000000 +0000
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ int
process_bmbt_reclist_int(
xfs_mount_t *mp,
xfs_bmbt_rec_t *rp,
- int numrecs,
+ int *numrecs,
int type,
xfs_ino_t ino,
xfs_drfsbno_t *tot,
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ process_bmbt_reclist_int(
else
ftype = _("regular");
- for (i = 0; i < numrecs; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < *numrecs; i++) {
libxfs_bmbt_disk_get_all(rp + i, &irec);
if (i == 0)
*last_key = *first_key = irec.br_startoff;
@@ -831,6 +831,13 @@ _("illegal state %d in block map %" PRIu
done:
if (locked_agno != -1)
pthread_mutex_unlock(&ag_locks[locked_agno]);
+
+ if (i != *numrecs) {
+ ASSERT(i < *numrecs);
+ do_warn(_("correcting nextents for inode %" PRIu64 "\n"), ino);
+ *numrecs = i;
+ }
+
return error;
}
@@ -842,7 +849,7 @@ int
process_bmbt_reclist(
xfs_mount_t *mp,
xfs_bmbt_rec_t *rp,
- int numrecs,
+ int *numrecs,
int type,
xfs_ino_t ino,
xfs_drfsbno_t *tot,
@@ -863,7 +870,7 @@ int
scan_bmbt_reclist(
xfs_mount_t *mp,
xfs_bmbt_rec_t *rp,
- int numrecs,
+ int *numrecs,
int type,
xfs_ino_t ino,
xfs_drfsbno_t *tot,
@@ -1356,23 +1363,29 @@ process_exinode(
xfs_bmbt_rec_t *rp;
xfs_dfiloff_t first_key;
xfs_dfiloff_t last_key;
+ int numrecs;
+ int ret;
lino = XFS_AGINO_TO_INO(mp, agno, ino);
rp = (xfs_bmbt_rec_t *)XFS_DFORK_PTR(dip, whichfork);
*tot = 0;
- *nex = XFS_DFORK_NEXTENTS(dip, whichfork);
+ numrecs = XFS_DFORK_NEXTENTS(dip, whichfork);
+
/*
* XXX - if we were going to fix up the btree record,
* we'd do it right here. For now, if there's a problem,
* we'll bail out and presumably clear the inode.
*/
if (check_dups == 0)
- return(process_bmbt_reclist(mp, rp, *nex, type, lino,
+ ret = process_bmbt_reclist(mp, rp, &numrecs, type, lino,
tot, blkmapp, &first_key, &last_key,
- whichfork));
+ whichfork);
else
- return(scan_bmbt_reclist(mp, rp, *nex, type, lino, tot,
- whichfork));
+ ret = scan_bmbt_reclist(mp, rp, &numrecs, type, lino, tot,
+ whichfork);
+
+ *nex = numrecs;
+ return ret;
}
/*
@@ -2063,6 +2076,17 @@ _("bad anextents %d for inode %" PRIu64
lino, anextents);
}
}
+
+ /*
+ * We are comparing different units here, but that's fine given that
+ * an extent has to have at least a block in it.
+ */
+ if (nblocks < nextents + anextents) {
+ do_warn(
+_("nblocks (%" PRIu64 ") smaller than nextents for inode %" PRIu64 "\n"), nblocks, lino);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
Index: xfsprogs-dev/repair/dinode.h
===================================================================
--- xfsprogs-dev.orig/repair/dinode.h 2012-01-11 11:23:30.000000000 +0000
+++ xfsprogs-dev/repair/dinode.h 2012-02-02 11:17:38.000000000 +0000
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ convert_extent(
int
process_bmbt_reclist(xfs_mount_t *mp,
xfs_bmbt_rec_t *rp,
- int numrecs,
+ int *numrecs,
int type,
xfs_ino_t ino,
xfs_drfsbno_t *tot,
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ int
scan_bmbt_reclist(
xfs_mount_t *mp,
xfs_bmbt_rec_t *rp,
- int numrecs,
+ int *numrecs,
int type,
xfs_ino_t ino,
xfs_drfsbno_t *tot,
Index: xfsprogs-dev/repair/scan.c
===================================================================
--- xfsprogs-dev.orig/repair/scan.c 2012-01-11 11:23:30.000000000 +0000
+++ xfsprogs-dev/repair/scan.c 2012-02-02 11:17:38.000000000 +0000
@@ -351,12 +351,12 @@ _("inode %" PRIu64 " bad # of bmap recor
* we'll bail out and presumably clear the inode.
*/
if (check_dups == 0) {
- err = process_bmbt_reclist(mp, rp, numrecs,
- type, ino, tot, blkmapp,
- &first_key, &last_key,
- whichfork);
+ err = process_bmbt_reclist(mp, rp, &numrecs, type, ino,
+ tot, blkmapp, &first_key,
+ &last_key, whichfork);
if (err)
- return(1);
+ return 1;
+
/*
* check that key ordering is monotonically increasing.
* if the last_key value in the cursor is set to
@@ -380,10 +380,11 @@ _("out-of-order bmap key (file offset) i
bm_cursor->level[level].first_key = first_key;
bm_cursor->level[level].last_key = last_key;
- return(0);
- } else
- return(scan_bmbt_reclist(mp, rp, numrecs,
- type, ino, tot, whichfork));
+ return 0;
+ } else {
+ return scan_bmbt_reclist(mp, rp, &numrecs, type, ino,
+ tot, whichfork);
+ }
}
if (numrecs > mp->m_bmap_dmxr[1] || (isroot == 0 && numrecs <
mp->m_bmap_dmnr[1])) {
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
