On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:02:11PM +0900, HAYASAKA Mitsuo wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > I'd like to explain the reason why I sent the patch series. > > Here is an example where I activated user quota and set each softlimit and > hardlimit as follows. > > | softlimit | hardlimit > ------------------------------- > block | 1M | 2M > ------------------------------- > inode | 3 | 5 > > I succeeded to create files up to the inode hardlimit using touch command. > The quota information is shown as follows. > > # xfs_quota -x -c 'report -u -b -i -h' /mnt/xfs2 > User quota on /mnt/xfs2 (/dev/vdb) > Blocks Inodes > User ID Used Soft Hard Warn/Grace Used Soft Hard Warn/Grace > ---------- --------------------------------- --------------------------------- > root 0 0 0 00 [------] 3 0 0 00 [------] > xfstest01 0 1M 2M 00 [------] 5 3 5 00 [6 days] > ~~~~ ~~ > > However, I failed to create and add another file due to the quota limitation. > > $ touch /mnt/xfs2/dir00/file05 > touch: cannot touch `/mnt/xfs2/dir00/file05': Disk quota exceeded > > It seems the inode quota works well. > > Regarding the block quota, I got the quota limitation message even if I > created a 2MB file which is equal to the hardlimit of disk quota. > > $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/xfs2/dir00/file01 bs=2M count=1 > dd: writing `/mnt/xfs2/dir00/file01': Disk quota exceeded > 1+0 records in ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 0+0 records out > 2093056 bytes (2.1 MB) copied, 0.00561516 s, 373 MB/s > > I'd like to change the available range of the block quota, and > also change the inode quota check to the same way as the block check > introduced in PATCH 2/3 to make it more general. Makes sense. Can you create an xfstests testcase containing the above test case? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
