On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> While xfs_iunlock is fine with 0 lockflags the calling conventions are much
> cleaner if xfs_file_aio_write_checks never returns without the iolock held.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c 2011-12-07 12:46:31.343897882 +0100
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c 2011-12-07 12:48:33.309903801 +0100
> @@ -636,7 +636,9 @@ out_lock:
> /*
> * Common pre-write limit and setup checks.
> *
> - * Returns with iolock held according to @iolock.
> + * Called with the iolocked held either shared and exclusive according to
> + * @iolock, and returns with it held. Might upgrade the iolock to exclusive
> + * if called for a direct write beyond i_size.
> */
> STATIC ssize_t
> xfs_file_aio_write_checks(
> @@ -653,8 +655,7 @@ xfs_file_aio_write_checks(
> restart:
> error = generic_write_checks(file, pos, count, S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode));
> if (error) {
> - xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | *iolock);
> - *iolock = 0;
> + xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> return error;
> }
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
