On 04/01/2012 13:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:20:05AM +0100, Yann Dupont wrote:
As it is, I can't see any material difference between the traces.
both reads and writes are taking the same amount of time to service,
so I don't think there's any problem here.
ok,
I do recall that some years ago that we changed one of the ways we
Do you recall exactly what some years ago means ? Is this post 2.6.26 era ?
The only thing that I remember is Jens switching xfs_buf_wait_unpin from
schedule to io_schedule in "block: remove per-queue plugging", which
went into Linux 2.6.39. With this processed that wait for buffers to
be unpinned now count towards the load average.
Ok, that's probably the root cause. As I already said, I don't
experience performance regression right now.
Thanks a lot for the explaination.
Cheers,
--
Yann Dupont - Service IRTS, DSI Université de Nantes
Tel : 02.53.48.49.20 - Mail/Jabber : Yann.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
