Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > You probably have only a third of the stack actually used by XFS, the > rest is from NFSD/writeback code and page reclaim. I don't think any > of this is easily fixable in a 2.6.32 codebase. Current mainline 3.2-rc > now has the I/O-less balance dirty pages which will basically split the > stack footprint in half, but it's an invasive change to the writeback > code that isn't easily backportable. An easy fix would be 16k stacks. Don't think they're that difficult to do, but would need a special binary. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
