On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 04:11:21AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 04:04:28PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > @@ -509,46 +518,27 @@ xfs_qm_dqpurge_int( > > > */ > > > xfs_qm_detach_gdquots(mp); > > > > > > - again: > > > - nmisses = 0; > > > > I don't think that nmisses is initialised to zero correctly anymore. > > We do a > > int nmisses = 0; > > at the top of the function. Now that there are no retry loops that's > sufficient. Hmmmm. My unmodified tree just has the declaration without initialisation, and I didn't find any place where the initialisation was added in the preceding patches. I'll go back and have another look. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs