On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:27:29AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Free dquots when purging them during umount instead of keeping them around
> on the freelist in a degraded state. The out of order locking in
> xfs_qm_dqpurge will be removed again later in this series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>
> - dqp->q_mount = NULL;
> - dqp->q_hash = NULL;
> - dqp->dq_flags = XFS_DQ_INACTIVE;
> - memset(&dqp->q_core, 0, sizeof(dqp->q_core));
> + list_del_init(&dqp->q_freelist);
> + xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist_cnt--;
> +
> xfs_dqfunlock(dqp);
> xfs_dqunlock(dqp);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist_lock);
> mutex_unlock(&qh->qh_lock);
> +
> + xfs_qm_dqdestroy(dqp);
> return (0);
> }
While there, you may as well make that a "return 0;"
> @@ -171,17 +176,6 @@ xfs_qm_destroy(
> xqm->qm_grp_dqhtable = NULL;
> xqm->qm_dqhashmask = 0;
>
> - /* frlist cleanup */
> - mutex_lock(&xqm->qm_dqfrlist_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(dqp, n, &xqm->qm_dqfrlist, q_freelist) {
> - xfs_dqlock(dqp);
> - list_del_init(&dqp->q_freelist);
> - xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist_cnt--;
> - xfs_dqunlock(dqp);
> - xfs_qm_dqdestroy(dqp);
> - }
> - mutex_unlock(&xqm->qm_dqfrlist_lock);
> - mutex_destroy(&xqm->qm_dqfrlist_lock);
> kmem_free(xqm);
> }
Don't we still need that mutex_destroy() call there?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
