On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 01:11:41PM -0600, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > The code does not assume that it got the space when it wakes up. After > every wake up it does check for free bytes available and compares to > required bytes before granting the bytes to itself. (IOW, after waking > up it behaves the same way as the lock-less case) > > As Dave pointed, I can see only the signal case to be effecting this > scenario. With that case in mind, I can see one change required to my > patch: Add the ticket to the list the second time (in a function) only > if the t_queue is not empty. You can still leak with the process added to the queue if you get a wakeup and there is space available. And your second patch now has to re-add conditional add to queue band aids that the first one so nicely removed. My version of that patch has the big advantage of actually making the whole scheme mirror that of a wait queue. In fact we could use workqueues and the helpers for it later (except for the waker side, which is special). _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
