(2011/11/22 18:33), Dave Chinner wrote: > Good idea, but given this check is now repeated in multiple places, > wrapping it in a "_require_aiodio" helper function is probably in > order. Good point. OK, I'll make a patch to implement the "_require_aiodio" helper. Thanks, H.Seto _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
