On Monday 14 of November 2011, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Allow linking against the libtcmalloc library from Google's performance > tools, which at least for repair reduces the memory usage dramatically. Should -fno-builtin-malloc be also used? --- xfsprogs-3.1.7/configure.in.org 2011-11-18 07:58:49.815439699 +0100 +++ xfsprogs-3.1.7/configure.in 2011-11-18 07:59:49.360093001 +0100 @@ -31,6 +31,26 @@ AC_SUBST(libeditline) AC_SUBST(enable_editline) +AC_ARG_ENABLE(tcmalloc, +[ --enable-tcmalloc=[yes/no] Enable tcmalloc [default=no]],, + enable_tcmalloc=check) + +if test x$enable_tcmalloc != xno; then + saved_CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS" + CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -fno-builtin-malloc" + AC_CHECK_LIB([tcmalloc_minimal], [malloc], [libtcmalloc="-ltcmalloc_minimal"], + [AC_CHECK_LIB([tcmalloc], [malloc], [libtcmalloc="-ltcmalloc"], [ + if test x$enable_tcmalloc = xyes; then + AC_MSG_ERROR([libtcmalloc_minimal or libtcmalloc library not found], 1) + fi] + )] + ) + if test x$libtcmalloc = x; then + CPPFLAGS="$saved_CPPFLAGS" + fi +fi +AC_SUBST(libtcmalloc) + AC_ARG_ENABLE(termcap, [ --enable-termcap=[yes/no] Enable terminal capabilities library [default=no]], test $enable_termcap = yes && libtermcap="-ltermcap",) Index: xfsprogs-dev/include/builddefs.in =================================================================== --- xfsprogs-dev.orig/include/builddefs.in 2011-08-14 17:00:02.000000000 +0000 +++ xfsprogs-dev/include/builddefs.in 2011-11-14 12:09:52.000000000 +0000 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ _BUILDDEFS_INCLUDED_ = 1 DEBUG = @debug_build@ OPTIMIZER = @opt_build@ -MALLOCLIB = @malloc_lib@ +MALLOCLIB = @malloc_lib@ @libtcmalloc@ LOADERFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@ LTLDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@ CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@ -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
