On 15 November 2011 17:18, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00:50PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On 15 November 2011 08:48, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > This new version basically replaced the build-depends on
> > libreadline-gplv2-dev
> > by a build-depends on
> > libreadline5-dev | libreadline-gplv2-dev
> >
> > Given libreadline5-dev is not in the archive, the package can't be
> > built,
>
>
> It seems to work as expected for me (iow, if either of the two are
> installed, it proceeds with using the installed package). I tested both
> variants on latest unstable, so I'm at a loss to explain the failure you're
> seeing - can you forward the build output showing the issue?
The buildd daemons require that the first package of an alternative
exists in the archive, which is not the case there.
*nod* - right you are - I look after another package which (by sheer good luck) got these the other the way around, correctly, and its building fine. I'll get a patch out for review, and get a new release uploaded soon.
Thanks for the tip, Aurelien!
cheers.
--
Nathan
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
