On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 10:38:04AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: >> btrfs requires at least 256M file system size, so check 'fssize' in >> _scratch_mkfs_sized first and give it a proper value. Otherwise >> mkfs.btrfs will complain something like >> >> "File system size 267386880 bytes is too small, 256M is required at least" >> >> This makes 015 077 and 083 run on btrfs. > > But it's not really going to test the ENOSPC conditions it was designed > to exercise. It would be better to either find a way to make btrfs run on > smaller filesystem, or call _notrun for too small filesystems on btrfs > from _scratch_mkfs_sized. Yes, you're right. I checked 015 (it would dd zero to btrfs to full) but forgot to check 077 and 083. I'll try to find a better way. Thanks for reviewing! Eryu Guan > >> >> Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> common.rc | 5 +++++ >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/common.rc b/common.rc >> index e948169..ab61786 100644 >> --- a/common.rc >> +++ b/common.rc >> @@ -356,6 +356,11 @@ _scratch_mkfs_sized() >> /sbin/mkfs.$FSTYP $MKFS_OPTIONS -b $blocksize $SCRATCH_DEV $blocks >> ;; >> btrfs) >> + # btrfs needs at least 256M file system size >> + if [ $fssize -lt $((256*1024*1024)) ] >> + then >> + fssize=$((256*1024*1024)) >> + fi >> $MKFS_BTRFS_PROG $MKFS_OPTIONS -b $fssize $SCRATCH_DEV >> ;; >> *) >> -- >> 1.7.7.1 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> xfs mailing list >> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx >> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > ---end quoted text--- > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
