On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:30:47AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:13:05PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > To be used for bit wakeup i_flags needs to be an unsigned long or we'll > > run into trouble on big endian systems. Beause of the 1-byte i_update > > field right after it this actually causes a fairly large size increase > > on it's own (4 or 7 bytes), but that increase will be more than offset > > by the next two patches. > > You could always make the i_update_core boolean a flag bit, and that > growth will also go away. Regardless: I could. Then again I plan to kill it for 3.3, so re-arranging the deck charis now might not be all that useful. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
