Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: replace i_flock with a sleeping bitlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:13:06PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We almost never block on i_flock, the exception is synchronous inode
> flushing.  Instead of bloating the inode with a 16/24-byte completion
> that we abuse as a semaphore just implement it as a bitlock that uses
> a bit waitqueue for the rare sleeping path.  This primarily is a
> tradeoff between a much smaller inode and a faster non-blocking
> path vs a faster faster wakeups, and we are much better off with
> the former.
> 
> A small downside is that we will lose lockdep checking for i_flock, but
> given that it's always taken inside the ilock that should be acceptable.
> 
> Note that for example the inode writeback locking is implemented in a
> very similar way.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

.....
> @@ -716,3 +716,19 @@ xfs_isilocked(
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif
> +
> +void
> +__xfs_iflock(
> +	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
> +{
> +	wait_queue_head_t *wq = bit_waitqueue(&ip->i_flags, __XFS_IFLOCK);
> +	DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &ip->i_flags, __XFS_IFLOCK);
> +
> +	do {
> +		prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wq, &wait.wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +		if (xfs_isiflocked(ip))
> +			schedule();
> +	} while (!xfs_iflock_nowait(ip));
> +
> +	finish_wait(wq, &wait.wait);
> +}

Given that the only way that the inode will become unlocked is for
IO to complete, that makes this an IO wait, right? Perhaps this
should call io_schedule() in that case?

> @@ -380,6 +372,8 @@ static inline void xfs_ifunlock(xfs_inod
>  #define XFS_IFILESTREAM		0x0010	/* inode is in a filestream directory */
>  #define XFS_ITRUNCATED		0x0020	/* truncated down so flush-on-close */
>  #define XFS_IDIRTY_RELEASE	0x0040	/* dirty release already seen */
> +#define __XFS_IFLOCK		8	/* inode is beeing flushed right now */
> +#define XFS_IFLOCK		(1 << __XFS_IFLOCK)

Any reason for leaving a gap in the flag space here?

Otherwise looks good.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux