On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:03:14PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:43:11PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > > > I would like to start marking versioned releases of xfstests. The > > > following adds the release script used in the other XFS user space > > > packages. I have arbitrarily set the version to 3.0.0 to make it > > > more in line with the other XFS user space packages as well. I > > > created an initial CHANGES file with a simple summary of some > > > recently-added tests. > > > > Whye the bump to 3.x? > > Like I said, it was somewhat just to align it better with > the other XFS user space packages. One could also think > about lining it up with kernel versions as well, and we > could plan on releasing a new edition of xfstests roughly > corresponding with the Linux releases. > > But it really is arbitrary, and if you have a reason to > use something else, great, we'll use it. If not, it > doesn't much matter. I don't really care that much, but doing a 1.0 release for the first public release is what I'd expect. To be honest until it is in a shape where it can nicely packaged (e.g. different directory for operations vs source code/scripts) I'm not even sure it warrants 1.0 and shouldn't be 0.1 intead. > > -Alex > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ---end quoted text--- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
