On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:17:20AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: > The amount of dirtyable pages should not include the full number of > free pages: there is a number of reserved pages that the page > allocator and kswapd always try to keep free. > > The closer (reclaimable pages - dirty pages) is to the number of > reserved pages, the more likely it becomes for reclaim to run into > dirty pages: > > +----------+ --- > | anon | | > +----------+ | > | | | > | | -- dirty limit new -- flusher new > | file | | | > | | | | > | | -- dirty limit old -- flusher old > | | | > +----------+ --- reclaim > | reserved | > +----------+ > | kernel | > +----------+ > > This patch introduces a per-zone dirty reserve that takes both the > lowmem reserve as well as the high watermark of the zone into account, > and a global sum of those per-zone values that is subtracted from the > global amount of dirtyable pages. The lowmem reserve is unavailable > to page cache allocations and kswapd tries to keep the high watermark > free. We don't want to end up in a situation where reclaim has to > clean pages in order to balance zones. > > Not treating reserved pages as dirtyable on a global level is only a > conceptual fix. In reality, dirty pages are not distributed equally > across zones and reclaim runs into dirty pages on a regular basis. > > But it is important to get this right before tackling the problem on a > per-zone level, where the distance between reclaim and the dirty pages > is mostly much smaller in absolute numbers. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
