On 9/26/11 12:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:02:05AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 9/26/11 7:27 AM, Alex Elder wrote: >>> On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 07:27 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> This one actually ends up failing on XFS for me: >>>> >>>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ >>>> QA output created by 258 >>>> Creating file with timestamp of Jan 1, 1960 >>>> -Stat of file yields: -315593940 >>>> +Stat of file yields: -315615540 >>>> Remounting to flush cache >>>> -Stat of file yields: -315593940 >>>> +Stat of file yields: -315615540 >>>> >>>> Note that we still get the same for both, it just seems XFS rounds it >>>> a bit different. >> >> Hrm. Should we just test to be sure the timestamp is negative? >> The sign extension is the real error, so as long as it's not >> positive it's probably OK. > > Probably. This is on a 32-bit userspae, I guess that's why I see > different results from Alex. > could it be kernel clock resolution? Anyway, I'll see about changing it to just check for negative nrs. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
