On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Freitag, 23. September 2011 Lukas Czerner wrote: > > +# FS QA Test No. 251 > > +# > > +# This test was created in order to verify filesystem FITRIM > > implementation. +# By many concurrent copy and remove operations and > > checking that files +# does not change after copied into SCRATCH_MNT > > test if FITRIM implementation +# corrupts the filesystem > > (data/metadata). > > This is a bit misspelled and (for me being non-native english) hard to > understand. I guess it should be > > This test was created in order to verify the filesystem FITRIM > implementation by doing many concurrent copy and remove operations and > checking that files do not change after being copied into SCRATCH_MNT. > Test if FITRIM implementation corrupts the filesystem (data/metadata). > > (Where I'm not sure if the last sentence belongs there, or in a separate > paragraph, or is redundant to the first sentence) > Oops, the whole paragraph does not belong there. It is leftover from a different test I have wrote earlier. Thanks for noticing it and sorry for the confusion. -Lukas _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs