On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:12:02PM +0800, Zhu Han wrote: > I note below words in the manual of fsync: > Calling fsync() does not necessarily ensure that the entry in > the directory containing the file has also reached disk. For that an > explicit fsync() on a file > descriptor for the directory is also needed. > > I am wondering is directory sync is essential after below steps if I want to > assure the file can be retrieved after system crash? > > 1) create file A > 2) write file A > 3) fsync(file A) > > --------------------------------> fsync(parent directory) [Is it essential > to make the inode linked to parent directory?] As far as standards are concerned it is. As far as the current XFS implementation is concerned you don't need it as the file fsync will also force out all transactions that belong to the create. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
