Am 21.09.2011 um 14:26 schrieb Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > What is also strange is that we allocate a xfs_ail_wq, but don't > actually use it, although it would have the same idea. Stefan, > can you try the following patch? This moves the ail work to it's > explicit queue, and makes sure we never have the same work item > (= same fs to be pushed) concurrently. I will have the chance to test in a few hours again. Perhaps can test too? Stefan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs