Am 21.09.2011 00:30, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:35:57PM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Am 20.09.2011 19:24, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:23:00PM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
- what is the fs geometry?
What do you exactly mean? I've seen this on 1TB and 160GB SSD
devices with totally different disk layout.
The output of mkfs.xfs (of xfs_info after it's been created)
ssd:~# xfs_info /dev/sda3
meta-data=/dev/root isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=9517888 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=38071552, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=18589, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
Nothing special there.
So far I haven't been able to recreate it. How many runs did you
normally need on 3.1-rc? Note that so far I've run my known working
kernel, I'll test your config plus the drivers I need next.
I had only used 3.0.4 with bonnie++ to reproduce. 3.1-rc was running on
a prod. system.
Sadly i'm also not able to reproduce it reliable on every partition.
Sometimes it works sometimes not. Just retrying does not help. I had to
copy and delete random files from the part. and then start bonnie++ on
it. Perhaps i can give you a dd dump of the partition. But i had to
recreate one. My Intel SSD is now massivly slower than when i started
the tests. No idea why.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
