On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > I do not understand. Can you elaborate on what needs to be done. All callers that do the xfs_trans_binval only really care about buffers that already exist. So we don't even have to allocate a new buffer if it isn't in memory yet - note that it generally will be given that the buffer is attached to the transaction. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
