[and now with the correct Cc list] On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:09:36PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Aurelien, Nathan & Anibal, > > is there any chance we can get to a defintive agreement on how to > maintain the xfsprogs package? So far the idea of releasing the > upstream releases as Debian packages at the same time has worked > great for both Debian, and us xfs developers (which to a large > extents are heavy Debian users), but "inner" Debian circles heave > always complained about it. > > Can we please get an explanation of why it is so in proper written > englush, instead of doing by forced nmus? > > Also Nathan & Anibal - if there is no consesus for keeping the old > scheme what about dropping it? We can still keep the main Debian > packaging in the tree, and find a way to generate a normally NULL > Debian diff for it. I'm not quite sure how to do it, but there > must be some way. ---end quoted text--- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
