On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 03:36:21PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 01:43:22PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Commit 630421f6d449 attempts to avoid printing the "fallocate not > > supported" warning if the -q (quiet) option is specified on the > > command-line. Unfortunately tests 75 and 112 don't set the -q flag. > > This causes test failures for file systems that don't support > > fallocate or the punch hole functionality. > > > > I considered changing tests 75 and 112 to pass -q to fsx, but that > > would suppress other warning messages that could be legitimate test > > failures, so I decided to add a new -v (vebose) flag. > > Oh, so now we can have verbose quietness? Or is it quiet verbosity? > That quickly leads to insanity.... :/ > > The quiet flag only suppresses output that is otherwise logged and > output when a failure occurs. Hence setting the quiet won't cause > any loss of functionality or error detection for these tests so you > should just add the quiet flag to the tests. OK, I'll resubmit a patch which changes the tests (i.e., 75 and 112) to pass the -q flag to fsx. I had thought _not_ passing -q was deliberate, but reviewing the output, it does seem that none of the !quiet messages are all that important. - Ted _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
