On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:48:11AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > The only issue I see with this is that it brings back per-filesystem > workqueue threads. Because all the workqueues are defined with > MEM_RECLAIM, there is a rescuer thread per workqueue that is used > when the CWMQ cannot allocate memory to queue the work to the > appropriate per-cpu queue. Not much we can do about it. > If we are going to block here, then we probably should increase the > per-cpu concurrency of the work queue so that we can continue to > process other ioends while this one is blocked. True. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
