On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 04:43:45PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > That's similar to a check I added in a previous patch series to > avoid taking the ILOCK in IO completion if it wasn't necessary. THis > just checks earlier to avoid the workqueue switch, so it definitely > better than what I did. Yes, that's where it came from. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
