> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:27:05AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 03:59:34PM -0700, Robert Jacobs wrote: > > > > On Mittwoch, 17. August 2011 Robert Jacobs wrote: > > > > > I've attached the outputs of xfs_check and three different runs of > > > > > xfs_repair (with backtrace, when available). > > > > > > > > Can you provide a XFS metadump? That should help devs to reproduce the > > > > error. > > > > > > I've uploaded it to <http://eamp.org/metadumpf.lzma>. It's 9MB but I > > > have somewhat limited upload quota. I noticed that some filenames > > > weren't obscured so I obscured them by hand -- if this is a problem, > > > please tell me. > > > > The metadump image you have provided does not trigger problems on > > either 3.1.5 on a current xfs_repair build out of the xfsprogs-dev > > repository on my machines. Can you restore the image and run > > xfs_repair on the image and confirm it still crashes? > > I stand corrected - it doesn't crash on x86-64, but does crash on > i686. I get several different random crashes, so it looks like some > kind of heap corruption is occurring. Running under valgrind shows > that the inode extent blkmaps are getting out of bound reads and > writes. I think the problem is this: [...] > As it is, I'd recommend upgrading to x86-64 anyway - XFS on i686 > doesn't receive a lot of developer testing... Sadly, I can't upgrade to x86-64 because this is a i686 machine that I have not yet outgrown. Someday soon... But thank you very much! I now have a functioning filesystem again. - Robert Jacobs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs