On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 01:15:19PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We can just unlock the buffer in the caller, and the decrement of b_hold > would also be needed in the !unlock, we just never hit that case currently > given that the caller handles that case. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
